Topic: Issue 38

Not fixing issues with setback, density would be a mistake

Residents asked to prevent bad zoning, development decisions

Issue 38: Council officially opposing amendment

Letters: Residents have time to speak up; system working just fine

Letters: Issue 38 will upset balance, put the city at a disadvantage

Only division is with politicians who don't listen to the community

Letters: Issue would only provide time to prevent bad outcomes for city

Letters: Residents need time to digest facts, have the most to lose

Letters to the editor: Chamber backs 30-day policy, encourages informed decisions

Letters to the editor: Decision is clear, no to Issue 38 and yes to Michael on council

Letters to the editor: Issue 38 would help preserve Worthington's unique character

Letters to the editor: Issue about maintaining city's greatest asset, residents' voice

Worthington City Council: Proposal pledging to table issues fails to satisfy

Letters to the editor: Issue 38 an urgent response to inappropriate development

Letters to the editor: Issue 38 would facilitate city's responsible development

Letters to the editor: Charter change issue should be defeated as unnecessary

Letters to the editor: Brooks' city knowledge would help drive solutions on council

Letters to the editor: Issue 38 should be carefully considered in light of legacy

Letters to the editor: Belief that people deserve to be heard leads to support of issue

Letters to the editor: Michael's leadership, work to understand issues, stands out

Worthington City Council: Newcomer Foust leads voting to join incumbents

Issue 38 reaches finish as narrow winner

City reacting to charter issue

Year in review: Developments in business, traffic dominate city's news

Charter review: Group says referendum section likely won't change